Articles Posted in Alimony

Published on: | by

Financial disputes often continue long after a divorce judgment is entered. Questions frequently arise regarding enforcement mechanisms available to collect unpaid obligations, particularly when attorney’s fees are involved. A recent Florida decision highlights important limits on the use of income deduction orders in post-divorce litigation and clarifies when such orders may be used to collect attorney’s fee awards. If you are involved in a dispute concerning support enforcement or post-judgment family law issues, it is advisable to speak with a Miami family law attorney to understand your rights and available remedies.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the former spouses had been involved in extensive post-judgment litigation following the dissolution of their marriage, including prior appellate proceedings concerning the underlying final judgment.

It is alleged that the trial court entered multiple post-judgment orders that awarded attorney’s fees to the former husband, adjudicated the former wife in contempt, restricted certain discovery efforts, and issued income deduction orders designed to secure payment of the attorney’s fee awards. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Divorce litigation often involves complicated financial issues that require trial courts to carefully identify assets, liabilities, support obligations, and attorney’s fee awards. When required findings are missing or property is improperly classified, even an otherwise thorough final judgment may not withstand appellate review. A recent Florida opinion demonstrates how failures to make sufficient factual findings can affect nearly every aspect of a dissolution proceeding and highlights the importance of preserving such errors for appeal. If you are involved in a high-asset divorce or complex financial dispute, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney to ensure your rights are protected at every stage of the litigation process.

Case History

Allegedly, the parties were involved in a contested dissolution of marriage proceeding that required the trial court to address numerous financial issues, including equitable distribution, temporary support obligations, valuation of a law practice, attorney’s fees, and the characterization of certain investment accounts.

It is alleged that after trial, the court entered a final judgment resolving the parties’ disputes. The judgment valued the husband’s law practice, addressed temporary support arrearages, distributed certain assets and liabilities, awarded attorney’s fees to the wife, and treated a brokerage account that predated the marriage as a marital asset. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Alimony decisions often turn on more than what a party can afford at the time of trial. Courts must also consider how financial circumstances may change in the future and whether those changes warrant preserving the ability to revisit support. A recent Florida ruling highlights the importance of nominal alimony, a mechanism that allows courts to retain jurisdiction when a paying party’s current inability to pay is likely to improve. If you are dealing with alimony issues in South Florida, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney to ensure your rights are fully protected both now and in the future.

History of the Case

Allegedly, the parties were married for a significant period, and the central issue at trial was whether alimony should be awarded following the dissolution of the marriage.

It is alleged that the parties agreed that the wife had a financial need for support, while the husband contested the ability to pay based on claimed income limitations and ongoing financial obligations. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Financial rulings in divorce cases can reshape a party’s economic future long after the marriage ends, making precision and adherence to statutory standards essential. Disputes over equitable distribution, alimony, and child support often reveal how small legal missteps can lead to disproportionately large consequences. In a recent Florida decision, the court scrutinized a dissolution judgment that relied on improper classification dates and awarded financial relief inconsistent with the marital standard of living, ultimately requiring substantial portions of the judgment to be undone. If you are navigating a divorce involving significant financial issues or questioning whether a court’s ruling was legally sound, you should consult with a Miami family law attorney who can help you understand your rights and options before those errors become permanent.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the husband and wife were married for many years and enjoyed an upper-middle-class lifestyle, including living in large homes, traveling frequently, and maintaining financial stability. Over time, the marital relationship deteriorated, and the parties began living separate lives before filing any dissolution action.

It is alleged that after the separation, the parties filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in Pinellas County. The trial court ultimately entered a final judgment dissolving the marriage and addressing equitable distribution, permanent periodic alimony, and retroactive child support. In its findings, the court focused heavily on the date it believed the marital relationship effectively ended, rather than the statutory classification date tied to the filing of the petition.

Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Florida’s sweeping alimony reform continues to influence dissolution proceedings in significant and sometimes unexpected ways. One recent Florida decision demonstrates how the timing of legislative amendments can reshape the outcome of a long-term marriage’s financial resolution, even after the parties have completed a final hearing. If you or your spouse intends to end your marriage and you want clear guidance on how to protect your financial interests, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney as soon as possible.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the wife filed a petition in 2020 to dissolve the couple’s almost 20-year marriage. She sought permanent alimony. Both parties consented to a referral to a general magistrate, who conducted a hearing beginning in March 2023. The hearing concluded in late May 2023, but the magistrate did not issue any oral findings. The petition remained unresolved while the magistrate prepared a recommended order.

It is alleged that the magistrate issued a recommended order in August 2023 advising the circuit court to award permanent alimony to the wife. Before the circuit court adopted the recommendation, the husband moved to vacate the order, asserting that the 2023 amendments to section 61.08 eliminated permanent alimony in all dissolution petitions pending on July 1, 2023. The husband contended that because no final judgment had been entered before that date, the petition remained pending and the amended law applied. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

When Florida courts dissolve a marriage, their judgments must comply with current statutes governing spousal support and equitable distribution. Changes in the law can significantly affect the types of relief a trial court may award. A recent decision from a Florida court reinforces the importance of ensuring that all alimony awards conform to the 2023 revisions to section 61.08 of the Florida Statutes, which eliminated permanent alimony as an available remedy. If you are involved in a divorce in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help you navigate these complex statutory requirements.

History of the Case

It is reported that the defendant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in May 2023, seeking to end a long-term marriage of thirty-seven years. The plaintiff, who was fifty-seven years old, had not been employed since 2007 and had devoted her time to raising the parties’ children and maintaining the household. The defendant, employed by the City of Riviera Beach, earned approximately $67,200 per year and was the family’s sole financial provider. In November 2023, both parties appeared pro se before a senior circuit judge for a final hearing. No court reporter was present to create a transcript of the proceedings.

Allegedly, following the hearing, the trial court entered a final judgment that dissolved the marriage and awarded the plaintiff permanent monthly alimony in the amount of $2,000. The judgment also stated that the court would retain jurisdiction to divide the defendant’s pension once sufficient information became available. The judgment included no further findings explaining the basis for the alimony award or detailing the parties’ financial circumstances. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

When former spouses return to court over alimony, the battles are often as much about procedure as they are about money. Florida courts frequently stress that trial judges must follow both statutory requirements and jurisdictional rules. A recent case from a Florida court demonstrates how crucial timing is in post-judgment alimony disputes. Even when a trial court attempts to move cases forward, its orders may be undone if they are entered before jurisdiction has returned from the appellate court. If you are seeking or opposing an alimony modification in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help you navigate the process and protect your rights.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the former wife appealed a post-judgment order entered on September 12, 2023. That order reduced the former husband’s alimony obligation to $11,500 per month, required the former wife to pay over $400,000 in retroactive alimony, and granted the former husband a setoff that suspended his obligation until the repayment was made.

Allegedly, the case had already gone through earlier appeals. In a prior proceeding, the appellate court reversed an order modifying the former husband’s alimony obligation because the trial court failed to make the detailed findings required by Florida law. The case was remanded for further proceedings, but jurisdiction did not return to the trial court until the appellate mandate issued in February 2023. Continue reading ›

by
Posted in: Alimony
Published on:
Updated:

Published on: | by

In Florida, alimony determinations require careful application of a statutory two-step analysis designed to protect both parties’ financial rights while maintaining consistency with equitable principles. The process begins with a clear determination of each party’s actual financial need and the other party’s ability to pay. A recent decision from a Florida court demonstrates how improperly blending these analytical steps can lead to reversible error. If you are involved in a divorce proceeding where alimony is at issue, a Miami family law attorney can help ensure your rights are safeguarded through every phase of the litigation.

Factual Background and Trial Court Proceedings

It is reported that the parties’ marriage was dissolved by final judgment, during which the trial court evaluated alimony and other financial matters. The trial court found that the wife had a reasonable monthly need of $4,000 based on her testimony and documentary evidence. However, despite this explicit finding, the trial court immediately concluded that she had failed to demonstrate a need for alimony.

It is alleged that the court justified this conclusion by pointing to the wife’s physical ability to work and the substantial assets she received through equitable distribution. These findings appeared to contradict the initial recognition of a $4,000 monthly need. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

The legal landscape surrounding spousal support in Florida has undergone a significant transformation following the legislature’s 2023 decision to eliminate permanent alimony. A recent Florida divorce case demonstrates how courts must now reconsider alimony determinations when final judgments are pending on appeal after July 1, 2023. For anyone involved in a Florida divorce where alimony is at issue, this ruling serves as a critical reminder of how legislative changes can directly impact the outcome of a case. If you are navigating a divorce in Florida, it is essential to consult with a knowledgeable Miami divorce attorney who understands the current statutory framework.

Facts of the Case

It is reported that the former husband petitioned for dissolution of marriage and requested permanent alimony after a 24-year marriage. The trial court granted the request and entered a final judgment awarding the former husband permanent alimony in the amount of $1,750 per month. The trial court rendered its decision in February 2023, several months before the July 1, 2023, effective date of Florida’s revised alimony statute. The former wife filed a timely appeal from the judgment, challenging the alimony award on multiple grounds.

It is alleged that the former wife objected to the award of permanent alimony based on the newly enacted provisions of section 61.08, which, effective July 1, 2023, abolished permanent alimony in Florida. She argued that because her appeal was still pending after the statutory change took effect, the trial court’s alimony ruling should be reconsidered under the new law. The former wife also challenged the trial court’s findings related to the former husband’s financial need and her own ability to pay alimony. Continue reading ›

by
Posted in: Alimony
Published on:
Updated:

Published on: | by

Under Florida law, issues related to the enforcement of temporary support orders during divorce proceedings must adhere to the principles of finality and jurisdiction. Courts must carefully navigate procedural rules to ensure compliance with interlocutory and final judgments, avoiding errors that could render orders unenforceable. The importance of correctly applying the merger doctrine and procedural rules in family law cases was illustrated in a recent Florida divorce action. If you are involved in a divorce or support enforcement matter, consulting a Miami family law attorney can help protect your rights and ensure compliance with the law.

Facts of the Case and Procedural Setting

It is reported that the husband and wife divorced. The trial court subsequently issued temporary support orders requiring the husband to pay monthly expenses for the wife and their minor child. When the husband failed to comply, the court entered multiple contempt orders and money judgments. After the partial final judgment was entered, the husband moved to vacate the prior support and enforcement orders, arguing they were extinguished by the merger doctrine. The trial court agreed, holding that the temporary support orders merged into the partial final judgment and became unenforceable. The wife then appealed.

The Merger Doctrine in Family Law Cases

On appeal, the wife argued that the trial court erred by applying the merger doctrine to extinguish the temporary support orders and judgments, as the partial final judgment explicitly reserved jurisdiction over support and financial matters. The court agreed with the wife, holding that the merger doctrine did not apply to the unresolved issues of support and enforcement. Continue reading ›

Contact Information
19790 W Dixie Hwy #412
Miami, FL 33180
Toll Free: 800.596.0579Phone: 305.932.6542Fax: 305.932.6453

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Sandy T. Fox, P.A.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design