Martindale-Hubbell
The National Advocates
The National Advocates
National Board of Trial Advocacy
The Florida Bar
Best Lawyers
Client Distinction Award
The National Advocates

Published on: | by

Paternity disputes often unfold at the crossroads of biology, legal status, and parental identity, and few issues in family law ignite more urgency than determining who has the right to claim fatherhood. A recent ruling from a Florida court shows how quickly these cases can turn, especially when one man is already recognized as the legal father, and another comes forward with DNA evidence. If you are involved in a paternity dispute, it is smart to talk to a Miami family law attorney to ensure your rights are protected as your case unfolds.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the appellee filed a petition to determine paternity shortly after the child’s second birthday, asserting that he was the legal and biological father. The birth certificate filed with the petition listed him as the father, and a Certificate of Live Birth included a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity signed by both the petitioner and the child’s mother, witnessed by two individuals. Both affirmed they were the natural parents and were unmarried at the time of the child’s birth.

It is alleged that 10 days later, the mother filed a verified motion disputing the appellee’s biological paternity and requesting DNA testing. The appellee responded, noting that testing had been scheduled but that the acknowledgment of paternity already established legal paternity under Florida law. Following a hearing, the court found him to be the legal father and declined to order genetic testing. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Few areas of family law carry weight equal to termination of parental rights, where the court’s decision can permanently redefine a family’s future. These cases often involve complex medical evidence, competing expert testimony, and deeply emotional circumstances, all of which demand intensive judicial scrutiny. A recent decision from a Florida court highlights how courts evaluate claims of newly discovered evidence after parental rights have been terminated, especially when parents attempt to raise new expert theories long after trial. If you are involved in a dependency or termination proceeding, it is advisable to talk to a Miami child custody attorney for guidance on how to protect your parental rights.

Case History

Allegedly, the Department of Children and Families opened two dependency cases after discovering multiple unexplained and severe injuries on infant twins. These injuries included rib fractures, extremity fractures, a skull fracture, a lacerated liver, and a bruised eye, many of which displayed different stages of healing. The half-brother, though uninjured, lived in the same home as the twins and the parents when the Department sheltered the children. The cases were later consolidated.

It is alleged that the trial court conducted a full bench trial involving extensive medical testimony, photographic evidence, hospital records, and expert opinions addressing whether the injuries resulted from nonaccidental trauma or a potential medical condition such as brittle bone disease or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. After evaluating the evidence, the trial court found that the injuries were indicative of nonaccidental trauma and terminated the parental rights of both parents to the twins and the father’s rights to the half-brother.

Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Florida courts regularly confront deeply emotional disputes involving parental discipline, allegations of domestic violence, and the limits of legal protection in contentious family dynamics. A recent Florida ruling highlights the importance of distinguishing between genuine domestic violence and permissible parental discipline, especially when a trial court’s findings do not align with the allegations in a petition. If you are involved in a domestic violence or family law dispute in South Florida, it is in your best interest to speak with a Miami family law attorney as soon as possible.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the mother sought a domestic violence injunction on behalf of a minor child following an incident that occurred on December 31, 2022. The parties, who divorced in 2018, shared responsibility for the child, and the incident arose shortly after the child returned from a ski trip with the father. The petition accused the father of punching the child, grabbing her hair, pulling her to the ground, and repeatedly striking her until she vomited, followed by additional kicking.

It is alleged that the court appointed a Guardian ad Litem to assist in assessing the child’s best interests. Testimony at the final hearing revealed a different account of the confrontation. The father testified that he discovered marijuana and related items in the child’s belongings and decided to impose discipline by taking her cellphone. The child resisted, and a struggle ensued during which she broke his finger. He denied the specific acts of violence alleged in the petition. A neighbor testified that the child appeared upset but showed no visible injuries and did not request police involvement. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Florida’s sweeping alimony reform continues to influence dissolution proceedings in significant and sometimes unexpected ways. One recent Florida decision demonstrates how the timing of legislative amendments can reshape the outcome of a long-term marriage’s financial resolution, even after the parties have completed a final hearing. If you or your spouse intends to end your marriage and you want clear guidance on how to protect your financial interests, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney as soon as possible.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the wife filed a petition in 2020 to dissolve the couple’s almost 20-year marriage. She sought permanent alimony. Both parties consented to a referral to a general magistrate, who conducted a hearing beginning in March 2023. The hearing concluded in late May 2023, but the magistrate did not issue any oral findings. The petition remained unresolved while the magistrate prepared a recommended order.

It is alleged that the magistrate issued a recommended order in August 2023 advising the circuit court to award permanent alimony to the wife. Before the circuit court adopted the recommendation, the husband moved to vacate the order, asserting that the 2023 amendments to section 61.08 eliminated permanent alimony in all dissolution petitions pending on July 1, 2023. The husband contended that because no final judgment had been entered before that date, the petition remained pending and the amended law applied. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

In family law, financial calculations must strictly comply with statutory requirements to ensure fairness and accuracy. When trial courts base support obligations on gross income rather than net income, the result can significantly overstate a parent’s ability to pay. A recent decision from a Florida court highlights this principle, reversing a trial court’s child support determination that improperly relied on gross income figures. If you are involved in a child support dispute in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help ensure that all income calculations follow the statutory guidelines set forth in Florida law.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the plaintiff and defendant were involved in dissolution proceedings. The plaintiff operated as a self-employed cosmetologist who rented a salon booth and bore responsibility for her supplies, tools, and licensing. Her federal income tax returns reflected that her reported business income was derived from gross receipts minus ordinary and necessary expenses. In 2019, she reported gross annual receipts of $62,287 with business expenses totaling $21,408, leaving $40,879 in annual business income. Her 2020 return showed a similar pattern, with reported business income after expenses of $29,269. For 2021, her testimony and financial affidavit indicated a gross monthly income after expenses of approximately $3,078.

It is alleged that the trial court concluded that both parties earned roughly equal incomes of about $60,000 per year and therefore determined that neither party was entitled to child support. The plaintiff appealed several of these rulings, challenging the trial court’s treatment of her income and the resulting child support calculations.  She argued, in part, that this finding was inconsistent with the documentary evidence, which demonstrated a significantly lower net income after business expenses and allowable tax deductions Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

In family law, property division often presents complex issues when unmarried parents or former partners jointly own real estate. When co-owners cannot agree on the sale or disposition of property, Florida law allows one party to seek partition through the courts. However, even when parties reach an agreement to sell the property privately, that arrangement must still comply with statutory requirements and judicial oversight. A recent decision from a Florida court demonstrates that when a trial court approves a private sale in a partition action, the final judgment must include a fixed and reasonable time frame for completion of the sale, subject to court approval. If the property is not sold within that time, the court must order a judicial sale in accordance with chapter 64 of the Florida Statutes. If you are involved in a dispute over jointly owned property, a Miami family law attorney can help ensure that your rights are protected during the partition process.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the plaintiff filed a paternity action that also involved issues of timesharing and jointly owned property. The defendant counterclaimed for partition of the real property that both parties owned together. The trial court conducted proceedings addressing both the parenting and property issues. Following those proceedings, the trial court entered a final judgment that established the parties’ timesharing arrangement and ordered partition of their jointly held property.

Allegedly, the trial court approved a plan for the parties to sell the property privately, rather than through a judicial sale. The record reflects that both parties voluntarily agreed to attempt a private sale and sought to avoid the costs and procedural requirements associated with a court-supervised sale. The judgment, however, did not include a specific time limit for the sale or provide for court involvement if the sale failed to occur within a reasonable period. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

When a marriage ends, the division of property and financial obligations between spouses can be one of the most contested aspects of the case. Florida law requires trial courts to follow statutory procedures when determining equitable distribution and alimony, including specific factual findings to support their conclusions. A recent Florida decision demonstrates that when trial courts fail to make these required findings, appellate courts will reverse and remand for correction. If you are facing a divorce in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help ensure that all financial determinations in your case are fair, transparent, and consistent with the law.

Factual and Procedural Background

It is reported that the defendant filed for dissolution of marriage in January 2019. The marriage began in 2010. During the litigation, the parties resolved several issues by agreement but left key financial matters for trial, including the valuation of the marital home, the award of alimony, and the defendant’s alleged failure to make mortgage payments as ordered by the court. A bench trial took place in April 2022 to address these remaining issues.

Allegedly, the marital home was valued by an independent appraiser at $338,000 as of the filing date and $475,000 as of the trial date. The defendant had made mortgage payments of $1,825 per month until December 2020, nearly two years after filing for divorce. The plaintiff made certain expenditures on the home’s maintenance and repairs, but a portion of those costs related to vehicle repairs rather than the residence itself. At the time of trial, the mortgage principal was approximately $267,000, with an additional $28,000 in arrearages resulting from missed payments. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

When Florida courts dissolve a marriage, their judgments must comply with current statutes governing spousal support and equitable distribution. Changes in the law can significantly affect the types of relief a trial court may award. A recent decision from a Florida court reinforces the importance of ensuring that all alimony awards conform to the 2023 revisions to section 61.08 of the Florida Statutes, which eliminated permanent alimony as an available remedy. If you are involved in a divorce in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help you navigate these complex statutory requirements.

History of the Case

It is reported that the defendant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in May 2023, seeking to end a long-term marriage of thirty-seven years. The plaintiff, who was fifty-seven years old, had not been employed since 2007 and had devoted her time to raising the parties’ children and maintaining the household. The defendant, employed by the City of Riviera Beach, earned approximately $67,200 per year and was the family’s sole financial provider. In November 2023, both parties appeared pro se before a senior circuit judge for a final hearing. No court reporter was present to create a transcript of the proceedings.

Allegedly, following the hearing, the trial court entered a final judgment that dissolved the marriage and awarded the plaintiff permanent monthly alimony in the amount of $2,000. The judgment also stated that the court would retain jurisdiction to divide the defendant’s pension once sufficient information became available. The judgment included no further findings explaining the basis for the alimony award or detailing the parties’ financial circumstances. Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

When a divorce case goes to final judgment, the outcome has long-lasting effects on child support, health insurance, and financial obligations. Florida appellate courts often review trial court decisions to ensure that all statutory requirements have been met and that the judgment does not impose obligations beyond what the parties requested. A recent decision from a Florida appellate court shows how even small errors in a final judgment can require partial reversal and correction. If you are navigating a divorce in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help you protect your rights and ensure that all court orders are properly crafted.

Factual and Procedural Setting

It is reported that the husband appealed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, raising multiple claims of error. While most issues were affirmed, the appellate court identified four errors that required reversal and remand for correction.

Allegedly, the first error concerned the child support guidelines worksheet. Although the judgment generally referenced worksheets, it did not attach or specifically identify the worksheet relied upon. Florida law requires either attachment of the worksheet or a clear reference to it within the judgment. Continue reading ›

by
Posted in: Divorce
Published on:
Updated:

Published on: | by

Few cases are more difficult than those involving the termination of parental rights. Florida law requires courts to balance the rights of parents with the best interests and safety of children. In some situations, the Department of Children and Families may proceed under an expedited process that does not require a reunification plan or services before seeking termination. A recent decision from a Florida court illustrates how this process operates and why the appellate court will uphold such a judgment when the record demonstrates sufficient evidence. If you are facing a dependency or termination case in Florida, a Miami family law attorney can help ensure that your rights and your child’s welfare are both protected.

History of the Case

It is reported that the mother appealed a July 25, 2024, final judgment terminating her parental rights as to her daughter. Although the record reflected that in the months before trial, she made progress in employment, housing, and sobriety, these improvements occurred while the child was in a temporary shelter and while she was not responsible for daily parenting.

Allegedly, the child had been sheltered due to the mother’s mental health and behavioral struggles. These issues mirrored those that had previously led to the termination of her parental rights to two other children, one in 2007 and another in 2018. Continue reading ›