Custody/Time-Sharing

Florida Court Discusses Guardian Ad Litem Fees

Published on: June 21, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Guardian ad Litem often plays an important role in high-conflict family law disputes by providing independent recommendations concerning a child’s best interests. Although trial courts have broad discretion to appoint a Guardian ad Litem when necessary, they must also carefully consider how the costs of that appointment will be allocated between the parties. A recent ruling by a Florida court demonstrates that a court cannot simply require one parent to bear the full financial burden without making the findings required by law. If you are involved in a custody, timesharing, or relocation dispute, consulting a Miami family law attorney can help ensure your financial and parental rights are protected throughout the litigation process.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the parties divorced several years before the dispute giving rise to the appeal. After the dissolution judgment, the mother sought a temporary suspension of the father’s timesharing with the parties’ minor children based on concerns affecting the children’s welfare. Following multiple evidentiary hearings, the trial court concluded that immediate reinstatement of timesharing was not in the children’s best interests, but ordered the parties to participate in reunification therapy to gradually rebuild the parent-child relationship.

It is alleged that the mother later sought permission to temporarily relocate to Massachusetts with the children after receiving a job opportunity. She asserted that the request was prompted in part by the father’s failure to satisfy child support obligations and other court-ordered financial responsibilities. After considering the statutory relocation factors, the trial court determined that temporary relocation served the children’s best interests, provided that reunification therapy continued and additional oversight was implemented. Continue reading ›

Florida Court Assess Childcare Responsibilities and Support Allocations

Published on: June 14, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Determining child support requires courts to assess each parent’s financial circumstances accurately, but income calculations are not always as straightforward as reviewing a paycheck. Parents who reduce their work schedules to care for young children often face disputes over whether additional income should be attributed to them for support purposes. A recent Florida ruling demonstrates that trial courts must carefully evaluate childcare responsibilities before imputing income and calculating child support obligations. If you are involved in a paternity or child support dispute, speaking with a Miami family law attorney can help ensure your financial circumstances are fairly considered under Florida law.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the father initiated a paternity action involving the parties’ two minor children, and the mother responded by filing her own petition. The litigation involved multiple motions, amendments, and discovery disputes before the matter ultimately proceeded to a final hearing.

It is alleged that the father did not appear for the final hearing, although his attorney attended on his behalf. The trial court dismissed the father’s petition but addressed the mother’s petition. During the hearing, evidence showed that the mother had served as the children’s primary caregiver for several years and that the father had not had the children overnight for more than two years. The mother also testified that she worked only part-time because she cared for five minor children and lacked reasonable childcare alternatives.

Reportedly, the trial court entered a final judgment awarding shared parental responsibility while granting the mother ultimate decision-making authority. The court established a timesharing schedule, imputed additional income to the mother based on full-time minimum wage employment, and calculated both ongoing and retroactive child support using that higher income figure.

Florida Court Explains Grounds for Terminating Parental Rights

Published on: June 7, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Termination of parental rights is among the most significant actions a Florida court can take because it permanently severs the legal relationship between a parent and child. Before entering such an order, the court must determine that statutory grounds exist, that termination is the least restrictive means of protecting the child from harm, and that the decision serves the child’s best interests. A recent Florida decision illustrates how appellate courts review these findings and the importance of a complete trial record when parental rights are at stake. If you are involved in a dependency or termination of parental rights proceeding, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney as soon as possible to protect your rights and your relationship with your child.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the Department of Children and Families initiated dependency proceedings involving a minor child after concerns arose regarding the child’s safety and welfare. As the case progressed, the parent was provided with a court-approved case plan designed to address the issues that had led to the child’s removal and facilitate reunification.

Florida Court Reinforces Due Process Protections in Family Law Proceedings

Published on: May 21, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Family law disputes often involve heated disagreements, urgent motions, and scheduling conflicts. While trial courts have broad authority to manage their dockets and address litigation conduct, that authority is not unlimited. Parties facing sanctions must still receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before financial penalties are imposed against them. A recent Florida ruling demonstrates the importance of these fundamental due process protections and serves as a reminder that courts must follow proper procedures before awarding sanctions. If you are involved in a contentious custody, paternity, or family law dispute, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney to ensure your rights are protected throughout the litigation process.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the parties were involved in a paternity action that included disputes concerning issues related to a child’s school boundary designation. A hearing on the father’s motions was scheduled for late May 2024.

It is alleged that two days before the scheduled hearing, the mother’s attorney moved to withdraw from representation based on irreconcilable differences. Counsel also requested a continuance to allow the mother adequate time to secure new legal representation. Continue reading ›

Florida Court Discusses Evidence in Termination of Parental Rights Cases

Published on: April 27, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

When a child’s life is endangered, courts must determine whether parental conduct rises to the level of egregious behavior sufficient to justify the permanent termination of parental rights. In a recent Florida case, the court examined that difficult legal threshold, demonstrating how courts evaluate severe neglect, expert testimony, and the sufficiency of evidence in life-threatening situations. If you are facing allegations that could affect your parental rights in South Florida, you should speak with a Miami family law attorney to understand how these legal standards may apply to your situation.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, a young child was brought to a hospital in an extremely malnourished state, suffering from significant medical complications that required emergency intervention and intensive care.

It is alleged that the child had not received consistent pediatric care for an extended period and that the parents delayed seeking medical attention until the child’s condition became critical. Medical professionals observed severe weight loss, muscle deterioration, and organ-related complications consistent with prolonged malnutrition. Continue reading ›

Court Examines Visitation Rights in the Context of Florida Dependency Cases

Published on: March 28, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Visitation rights play a critical role in maintaining the parent-child relationship during dependency proceedings, even when a child has been removed from a parent’s custody. Courts must carefully balance the child’s safety with a parent’s fundamental rights, ensuring that any modification to visitation complies with due process requirements. A recent Florida decision highlights the legal consequences of altering visitation without proper notice or an opportunity to be heard. If you are involved in a dependency proceeding, you should consult a Miami family law attorney to safeguard your rights and ensure that courts follow the required legal standards.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the child was removed from the mother’s custody and placed in substitute care, with the court ordering supervised in-person visitation twice per week. The mother complied with the visitation schedule and maintained regular contact with the child.

It is alleged that subsequent reports filed by the care provider and guardian did not recommend any changes to the existing visitation arrangement, nor did they indicate that in-person visitation would be restricted or eliminated.

Florida Court Discusses Statutory Requirements for Dependency Proceedings

Published on: March 14, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Termination of parental rights represents one of the most serious actions a court can take, permanently severing the legal relationship between a parent and child. Florida courts require strict compliance with statutory and constitutional safeguards before granting such relief, including proof of abandonment, best interests, and the least restrictive means of protecting the child. A recent Florida opinion illustrates how courts evaluate parental involvement, credibility, and the child’s long-term stability when determining whether termination is appropriate. If you are facing dependency proceedings, it is essential to consult with a Miami child custody attorney to determine your options.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the child was born prematurely to a mother struggling with substance abuse, and the Department became involved shortly after birth. The child was placed with foster parents within weeks, where the child remained throughout the proceedings.

It is alleged that the father initially denied paternity and declined to participate in the dependency process, despite being notified. Months later, the father appeared in the proceedings and asserted parental rights, at which point paternity testing confirmed his biological relationship to the child.

Florida Court Discusses Custody and Contempt Proceedings

Published on: February 26, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Child support rulings can reshape a parent’s financial future overnight, but when courts impose obligations without clearly establishing the ability to pay, those rulings may not withstand scrutiny. Florida law requires precise findings to support both child support awards and enforcement measures such as contempt, ensuring that financial obligations remain fair, enforceable, and grounded in reality. A recent Florida opinion demonstrates how overlooking these requirements can unravel key portions of a family law judgment and force further proceedings. If you are involved in a child support dispute or facing enforcement actions in South Florida, speaking with a Miami family law attorney can help you protect your rights and secure a legally sound outcome.

Case Setting

Allegedly, the father initiated appellate proceedings after the trial court entered a final judgment addressing paternity, time-sharing, and child support obligations. The trial court’s order required the father to pay ongoing child support as well as retroactive support, but the judgment did not include specific findings regarding the father’s present ability to pay those amounts.

It is alleged that the trial court also imposed an obligation requiring the father to pay a percentage of the child’s extracurricular activity expenses. The provision allowed the respondent to enroll the child in activities without requiring mutual agreement, potentially exposing the father to open-ended financial responsibility regardless of his financial circumstances.

Florida Legislature Considers Child Custody Bill

Published on: February 12, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Family law disputes involving time-sharing can have immediate and lasting consequences for both parents and children, particularly when delays in court intervention prevent meaningful enforcement of custody arrangements. In Florida, lawmakers are increasingly focused on addressing these delays and ensuring that parents can maintain consistent access to their children. A recent legislative proposal highlights the urgency of these concerns and reflects a broader effort to streamline time-sharing enforcement and reduce prolonged uncertainty. If you are dealing with a custody or time-sharing dispute in South Florida, speaking with a Miami family law attorney can help you understand your rights and pursue timely relief.

Facts and Procedural History

Reportedly, a Florida legislator introduced a bill to address delays in enforcing time-sharing arrangements, initially proposing that courts assign a duty judge to be available at all times to handle such disputes. The proposal was intended to provide immediate judicial intervention when one parent denies the other access to a child.

It is reported that the legislator later amended the bill by removing the requirement for a 24/7 duty judge, instead shifting the focus toward expediting court proceedings related to time-sharing. The revised proposal emphasizes the need to prioritize these matters within the court system.

Court Explains Limits on Authority Over Non-Parties in Florida Parenting Plan Modifications

Published on: January 15, 2026 | by Sandy T. Fox

Parenting disputes frequently raise concerns about conflict between households, particularly when new spouses or partners become involved in a child’s life. Florida courts are tasked with protecting children’s best interests, but that responsibility does not grant unlimited authority to regulate the conduct of individuals who are not parties to the case. A recent Florida ruling clarifies the procedural and jurisdictional limits on a trial court’s power to restrict non-parties through parenting plan modifications. If you are navigating a post-dissolution dispute involving timesharing, parental authority, or alleged third-party interference, consulting a Miami family law attorney can help you understand where judicial authority begins and ends.

Facts and Procedural History

Allegedly, the husband and wife divorced in 2016. One minor child was born during the marriage. Several years later, disputes arose after the wife remarried, and tensions developed between the husband and the wife’s current husband.

It is alleged that in 2019, the husband filed a supplemental petition for modification, accusing the wife’s current husband of physically attacking him during a public school event involving the child. The husband sought restrictions preventing the wife from bringing her current husband to activities and exchanges involving the child.