In a time-sharing dispute, what a parent puts in a pleading can shape the case long after filing. A parent seeking modification must establish a substantial and material change in circumstances and show that the requested arrangement serves the child’s best interests. A recent Florida decision shows how parties may bind themselves through their assertions and how a missing hearing transcript can restrict appellate review. If you face modification, enforcement, or contempt proceedings, a knowledgeable Miami family law attorney can help present and preserve the issues shaping your family’s future.
History of the Case
Allegedly, a Maryland court dissolved the parties’ marriage in 2017 and entered custody orders in 2018. The orders granted joint legal custody and joint decision-making authority. The child lived with the mother in Florida, while the father remained in Maryland and received time-sharing during summers, spring break, and alternating holidays. A Florida circuit court later registered the Maryland decrees.
It is alleged that the mother petitioned for modification in June 2024, asserting a substantial and material change in circumstances and accusing the father of violating time-sharing and communication obligations. She asked to limit him to supervised visitation in Pensacola. The father counter-petitioned, claimed that the mother had breached communication and decision-making requirements, and sought majority time-sharing plus ultimate authority over health and education. Continue reading ›
Fort Lauderdale Divorce Lawyer Blog

