Martindale-Hubbell
The National Advocates
The National Advocates
National Board of Trial Advocacy
The Florida Bar
Best Lawyers
Client Distinction Award
The National Advocates

Published on: | by

A Martin County father was recently placed on probation after pleading no contest to violating a little-known Florida law designed to ensure parents meet their child support obligations. According to a Martin County Court Clerk, the 34-year-old father was the first person in the county arrested under the law established to punish allegedly deadbeat parents. In addition to sentencing him to five years of probation, Circuit Judge William Roby also ordered the man to regularly pay the $550 per month in child support for his two children that was previously ordered by a family court judge and $69,542.88 in back child support and interest that has accumulated throughout his years of non-payment. Additionally, Judge Roby ordered him to perform 25 hours per week of community service throughout the period of his probation, pay $415 in court costs, and promptly notify the court of any changes in his employment status.

The case against this individual was filed after his ex-wife told local authorities about the little-known law. She reportedly grew weary of the man’s failure to pay his family court ordered child support. Instead, she produced contempt of court orders against him and asked Martin County authorities to prosecute her ex-husband using the third-degree felony statute. Apparently, only two other individuals in Florida have faced the same charge during the last decade.

The man in this case reportedly told Judge Roby he failed to pay his support obligations because he could no longer afford the payments due to a bad economy and the loss of his business. According to this father, his previous efforts to reduce the child support payments were denied. Assistant State Attorney Erin Kirkwood responded to these claims by stating a family court determined the man was able, but unwilling to meet his child support obligations. Although she attended the hearing, his ex-wife reportedly made no comments.

In the State of Florida, parents must provide financial support for their children. A child support award is determined using established statutory guidelines that take into account the costs of medical care, dental care, day care, and the amount of time each parent spends with a child pursuant to a child’s time sharing plan. If a parent voluntarily becomes unemployed or under-employed, a family court may choose to make an award of child support based on imputed income. Imputed income is normally established by examining a parent’s past employment record, job qualifications, and the local pay rate where the paying parent resides.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Summer means a lot of things including warmer temperatures, vacations, and a break from school for most children. To divorced parents, however, summer can be a source of contention and may make you want to revisit your time-sharing agreement. Former spouses may disagree regarding many aspects of a child’s summer break, but vacations can become especially problematic for divorced parents. Disagreements over the location and timing of vacations can easily lead to larger battles. By following a few simple steps, it is possible for divorced parents to avoid a summer vacation battle.

First, parents can plan ahead by creating a vacation schedule. Generally, when parents fail to make a vacation schedule either parent may take a child anywhere that is not restricted by the former couple’s custody agreement. By discussing parental concerns regarding the location, timing, and other vacation matters, former spouses have to opportunity respond to one another’s concerns before a disagreement arises. Once divorced parents come to an agreement regarding a vacation schedule, it is also important to follow the agreed upon plan where possible. If parents cannot agree on a vacation schedule, mediating the matter in front of a neutral third-party such as a child custody attorney may also be an option to consider.

No matter the subject, it is vital for divorced parents to maintain an open line of communication with one another. If vacation plans that involve children happen to change, the vacationing parent should notify their child’s other parent s soon as possible. For safety reasons, a former spouse should be kept informed of the location of the vacation, the length of the holiday, and the best way to reach their child in the event of an unexpected emergency. By doing this, the vacationing parent can also avoid explaining to a family court judge why important information regarding a child’s whereabouts was not disclosed to the child’s other parent.

Where necessary, a parent may choose to involve the courts in a dispute over vacation time. Normally, a child custody agreement will outline the amount of vacation time each parent will have with their children as well as the amount of notice that must be provided to the other parent prior to leaving on a trip. Travel locations may also be limited by a time-sharing agreement. Even where parents agree upon a vacation schedule, they may choose ensure an agreement is binding by submitting it to a family court for approval.

Since October 2008, divorcing parents of minor children in Florida must enter into a time-sharing agreement. A time-sharing agreement will state exactly how much time each parent will spend with their child including overnights, weekends, school breaks, and holidays. If a child’s parents cannot reach an agreement regarding a time-sharing schedule, a family court will create a schedule for them.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

A Fisher Island man was recently ordered to serve 180 days in jail after he reportedly allowed his 16-year-old son to marry the 18-year-old daughter of his housekeeper in an effort to remove the child from family court oversight. The 65-year-old father was charged with contempt of court and placed in the Miami-Dade Jail for allegedly taking his teenage son to Las Vegas the day after he turned 16 and providing him with consent to marry. The father allegedly did so after a Miami-Dade judge instructed the wealthy businessman to immediately place the child in a Utah boarding school for troubled teens. The boy was ordered to attend the school in November 2010 at the request of his father’s former wife. The teen’s mother, who was awarded joint custody of the boy when the couple split, reportedly asked the family court to place her son in the Utah school on the advice of an educational expert after he was arrested for striking a police officer.

Because the teen is now emancipated, the family court no longer has jurisdiction over him. Instead, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stanford Blake quizzed the father regarding the unexpected wedding. According to a hearing transcript, the boy was living in his father’s penthouse on Fisher Island immediately following the wedding. Meanwhile, the teen’s bride remained in Miami. Because the State of Nevada only requires the signature of one parent when a minor seeks to marry, the man reportedly allowed the boy to marry without his former spouse’s knowledge or consent.

At the father’s contempt hearing, his attorney told the court the Utah school declined to accept the boy due to his parents’ ongoing divorce. Despite the school’s rejection of the teen, Judge John Schlesinger stated the marriage was an obvious attempt to thwart the court’s order and keep the boy out of the school. Judge Schlesinger also said the man’s conduct was unacceptable and a clear example of indirect contempt of court. He is reportedly appealing his case to Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal.

Many Florida parents find themselves in the midst of a less than amicable divorce every year. Understandably, the host of emotions that are normally associated with the end of a marriage can be overwhelming. If you are considering divorce, you need a dedicated Florida family law attorney to help you protect your interests and those of your children.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Increasingly, former spouses in South Florida are utilizing the services of a parenting coordinator. A parenting coordinator is a type of mediator who ensures parents comply with a written parenting plan. The aim of parenting coordination is to encourage communication between divorced parents and prevent their children from becoming a victim in their disputes.

In 2009, the Florida Legislature passed a law that allowed parenting coordinators to have a legal role in disputes between divorced parents. Under the law, a judge can appoint a trained parenting coordinator to mediate any disputes about shared responsibility of a former couple’s children. A parenting coordinator’s role is to help former spouses establish a detailed written plan for a variety of issues such as parental responsibility for certain child costs, child transfer locations and times, and the role of extended family members in a child’s life. When the law was passed, Florida had about 200 trained parenting coordinators. There are now approximately 300 parenting coordinators located throughout the state. Around 15 coordinators currently work in each of Florida’s 20 judicial circuits.

According to Fort Lauderdale family mediator Debbie Sedaka, time-sharing conflicts frequently account for the largest number of parental quarrels. Sedaka stated disagreements between divorced parents often break out during a child’s transfer. She believes a parenting coordinator’s most important role is to teach divorced spouses how to communicate with one another in a way that does not expose their children to more conflict. Pembroke Pines psychologist Pamela Silver said the job of a parenting coordinator is often a stressful one. She also stated it can be extremely difficult to act as a parenting coordinator in circumstances where parents cannot place the needs of their children above their own.

Still, an increasing number of judges and social service organizations believe divorced parents engaged in frequent conflicts can benefit from an outside mediator. Psychologist Jill Schwartzberg, who was recently trained to be a parenting coordinator for a family service organization near Boca Raton, stated it is necessary for parents to find a way to resolve their conflicts in a peaceful manner. Despite the sometimes difficult nature of the role, Schwartzberg believes it is important for parenting coordinators to do their best to protect the emotional well-being of children who come from high conflict families.

In Florida, a child custody agreement is referred to as a time-sharing schedule. A time-sharing plan will establish in writing which parent a child will spend weeknights, weekends, overnights, holidays, and school breaks with. If divorcing parents are unable to agree on a time-sharing schedule, a family court judge will create a time-sharing plan based upon a parent’s moral fitness, any evidence of neglect or abuse, and a variety of other statutory factors. If you are currently engaged in a time-sharing dispute, you should contact an experienced Florida child custody lawyer to discuss your rights.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

The United States House of Representatives recently passed, by an overwhelming margin, a measure designed to protect deployed military service members involved in child custody disputes. H.R. 4201, the Servicemember Family Protection Act, was introduced by Representative Mike Turner of Ohio and passed the House after a vote of 390-2. The legislation, which was also reportedly passed as part of the 2013 defense authorization bill, will now move on to the U.S. Senate.

Interestingly, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, military family advocates, and legal experts have expressed opposition to the measure. The American Bar Association, National Military Family Association, and family law attorneys throughout the nation believe the proposed legislation would likely increase legal costs for military families involved in custody disputes because the bill as written creates a right to federal court review. Opponents of the law argue federal review may be detrimental to the children of parents in the military because federal courts may favor deployed service members and fail to consider the best interests of the child when custody is in dispute. Additionally, child custody cases could be heard by federal judges with little or no family law experience.

Representative Turner, who has reportedly supported a military child custody law for the past seven years, stated the proposed legislation is simple. Turner says the proposed law merely states that deployment status may not be used as a factor in child custody awards. He doesn’t believe the law would provide a service member with an undue advantage nor would it have an effect on other aspects of a child custody dispute. Turner said the law would merely remove a disadvantage currently in existence for deployed parents.

Two years ago, a study conducted by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) found that military deployments do not affect a parent’s child custody rights. The study also found no reported cases that would suggest parents in the military lost custody based solely on their deployment status.

Turner’s quest to pass the legislation has reportedly inspired several states to clarify or modify existing child custody laws related to deployed service members. Currently, 40 states have laws that do not allow military deployment to be used as the decisive factor in awarding child custody. Next month, a model Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act will be published by the nation’s Uniform Law Commission. Although not required, every state will be invited to adopt the language of the model act. Additionally, the DoD has ordered all service members to prepare a pre-deployment Family Care Plan to address child custody issues.

In October 2008, Florida abolished custodial designations for parents. Instead, child custody in the state is now referred to as time-sharing. A Florida time-sharing schedule establishes which parent a child spends not only holidays with, but also other times such as weekdays, overnights, and school breaks. If parents cannot agree on a time-sharing schedule, the family court will create a schedule that takes into account a variety of factors such as the moral fitness of each parent, any evidence of abuse or neglect, and other statutory factors. A knowledgeable Florida child custody attorney can explain the factors to you in more detail.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

In a recent Broward divorce case, the former husband appealed the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. He claimed that Broward Circuit Judge Alfred J. Horowitz entered a final judgment of dissolution of marriage that did not reflect a settlement agreement that was reached by the parties and subsequently announced on the record.

During the trial, the parties reached a settlement agreement which was announced on the record by the former wife’s counsel. The trial court ensured that both parties had discussed the terms and conditions with their lawyer, had their respective questions answered and were entering into the agreement freely and voluntarily. Next, the trial court instructed the lawyers to submit a proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage reflecting the agreement announced in open court. Counsel for the former wife moved for the entry of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage when the former husband had retained new counsel, Sandy T. Fox, Esquire, who objected to the former wife’s proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage.

At the hearing several weeks later, the former husband’s new Fort Lauderdale divorce attorney, Sandy T. Fox, Esquire, argued that the former wife’s proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage did not reflect to the oral stipulation announced on the record. Specifically, Mr. Fox disagreed with the proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage as it related to the duration of alimony, child support award, equitable distribution of the marital residence and the payment of attorney’s fees and costs. Judge Horowitz instructed the Broward divorce attorneys to submit a proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage in accordance with the settlement agreement that was announced in open court.

After receiving a letter from Mr. Fox that objected to the former wife’s proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage along with the former husband’s proposed final judgment of dissolution of marriage, the trial court adopted the former wife’s proposed final judgment of dissolution without any changes whatsoever.

The settlement agreement provided for durational alimony of $1,000 per month but did not specify that it would continue for ten years, a period of time unilaterally selected by the former wife. As such, the final judgment of dissolution of marriage was remanded for the trial court to consider the duration of alimony and make findings consistent with section 61.08, Florida Statutes (2009).
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Since 1990, the rate of divorce for couples over 50 years of age has doubled. Increasingly, women over age 40 are reportedly seeking to end their marriages. The phenomenon has been dubbed the empty nest divorce and affects about one in four baby boomer marriages. Researchers believe the soaring divorce rate is a result of increased financial independence and a generational emphasis on individual happiness.

52-year-old Debbie Jenkins found herself surprised when she divorced her husband of more than two decades as she thought she would be married for the rest of her life. Instead, she filed for divorce after realizing neither party to the marriage could relate to one another anymore. She reportedly relied on her grown children and other relatives to help her cope with the changes to her life following divorce. Fifty-something Thatia Cuchera echoed Jensen’s thoughts. She ended her marriage after realizing the relationship she hoped for would likely never materialize. Instead, Cuchera stated she decided to take a chance on herself and embrace the world alone.

Some believe the empty nest divorce trend is a natural result of increased longevity. As life expectancy increases, fewer people are willing to remain in a marriage that fails to meet their expectations for four or five decades. Others feel women have more choices today than their mothers did and enjoy an increased level of independence. Whatever the cause for the higher over-50 divorce rate, financial advisers caution late in life splits can be especially complicated. As couples near retirement, a divorce can have a significant impact on each spouse’s financial outlook as assets are split between the two parties.

If you are contemplating dissolving your marriage, it is important to keep in mind that the State of Florida is a no-fault divorce state. This means no one has to be held responsible for the end of a marriage. If you are facing a divorce or another stressful family law matter, contact a capable South Florida family law attorney to help you protect both your rights and your financial future.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals has ruled that attorney’s fees may be awarded pursuant to Section 61.16(1) of the Florida Statutes in a marital property settlement agreement enforcement action. In De Campos v. Ferrara, a former married couple dissolved their marriage in 1991. As part of the dissolution action, the parties entered into a property settlement agreement that required the former wife to pay her ex-husband one-half of the sale proceeds for a business the couple owned during their marriage. Although the business was not immediately sold, the trial court retained jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement.

In 2008, the wife sold the business, reportedly without telling the husband. He subsequently sought relief from the trial court that included a temporary injunction and an order compelling payment of his half of the sale proceeds. Although the wife argued that she previously disposed of the business by incorporating it into a new business and paying her former husband $48,000, the trial court disagreed. Instead, she was ordered to pay her former spouse one-half of the proceeds from the 2008 sale.

In 2009, the former husband filed a petition with the trial court for an award of attorney’s fees and other costs. The trial court denied his petition based on Flanders v. Flanders, stating that the action was “an equitable declaratory proceeding to construe and enforce the parties’ Property Settlement Agreement.” According to the trial court, Section 61.16(1) of the Florida Statutes did not apply to the parties’ case and the husband was not entitled to attorney’s fees since the property settlement agreement was silent on the matter.

On appeal, the Third District reversed the trial court by stating the matter was simply an enforcement action for a final judgment previously entered by the trial court. According to the Appeals Court, there was no ambiguity regarding whether the husband was entitled to proceeds from the sale of the business. Additionally, his former wife did not contest his rights. Instead, she merely contested whether her obligations under the property settlement agreement were previously satisfied. The Appellate Court stated Flanders did not apply to the case at hand because the proceeding was not a declaratory action. According to the Third District, Section 61.16(1) applied to the parties’ case because the court was merely being asked to enforce a marital property settlement agreement in a divorce matter filed pursuant to Chapter 61 of the Florida Statutes.

The Appeals Court also found the husband may be entitled to attorney’s fees because neither party expressly waived their statutory right to such an award in the property settlement agreement. Additionally, there was no implied waiver because the agreement failed to contain any language regarding an award of attorney’s fees. Since Section 61.16(1) applied to the case and governed any award of attorney’s fees, Florida’s Third District reversed and remanded the matter to the trial court.
Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Last month, North Miami Mayor Andre Pierre’s nephew, Ricardo Brutus, was recently arrested and charged with felony charges for practicing law without a license. He was released from the Miami-Dade County Jail after posting a $25,000 bond.

Brutus’s arrest comes while he is awaiting trial in a separate case. He was previously arrested on March 25, 2011 and charged with unlawful compensation.

His recent charges stem from a Florida Bar complaint by a lawyer who claims that Brutus signed his name on two Miami divorce petitions filed in 2009. The lawyer who reported Brutus stated that he paid him to file cases or complete petitions, but he did not authorize him to sign documents which should only be filed by divorce lawyers in South Florida.

Continue reading ›

Published on: | by

Going through a divorce can be stressful for everyone involved, including a couple’s children. Although a separation or divorce will impact each child differently, it is still a time filled with transitions. For children, a divorce can mean moving out of the family home, changing schools, new scheduling and custody demands, and meeting a parent’s new partner. Understandably, when parents divorce many children feel angry, confused, guilty, or exhibit symptoms of anxiety. There are several steps parents can take in order to make the adjustment period following marriage dissolution easier on their kids.

It is important for newly separated or divorced parents to encourage their children to openly communicate both positive and negative feelings. Most children will have a lot of questions and display a wide range of feelings about their new life. Although parents should keep a child’s feelings completely separate from their own, it is a good idea to ensure children going through their parents’ divorce that lines of communication with parents are always open. It may also be helpful for children to discuss their feelings with a friend whose parents recently became divorced. Divorcing parents should also regularly remind their children that the separation was not way the child’s fault.

In order to make the adjustment to separate households easier, divorcing parents should not put their children in the middle of parental conflict or animosity. No matter what a divorcing couple’s situation is, it is always a good idea for parents to make an effort to remain both neutral and factual when discussing either the divorce or their former spouse around their kids. To help keep children from feeling like they must ‘choose’ a side, any heated disagreements should be discussed away from the former couple’s kids. Additionally, children should not be placed in the role of either messenger or spy.

One of the best ways for a divorcing parent to ensure the separation does not impact children negatively is to take care of themselves as well as the kids. Although divorcing is not easy, a strong support network of family, friends, and even professional counselors can help a parent in the midst of a split maintain a positive outlook. This may help kids adjust more easily.

In Florida, a final judgment of divorce for the parents of minor children will include a child custody arrangement and a parenting plan. Such an arrangement is also called a time-sharing plan. A time-sharing plan will outline where a child will spend overnights, holidays, and other important days of the year. If you are a parent who is considering divorce, you should contact a knowledgeable Florida divorce lawyer for assistance with protecting your rights.
Continue reading ›

Contact Information
19790 W Dixie Hwy #412
Miami, FL 33180
Toll Free: 800.596.0579Phone: 305.932.6542Fax: 305.932.6453

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Sandy T. Fox, P.A.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design