Property disputes between former spouses often surface years after a divorce, especially when jointly owned real estate remains unsold and one party shoulders the financial burden alone. A recent decision from a Florida court highlights how courts address reimbursement claims in partition actions when a marital settlement agreement addresses some expenses but remains silent on others. The ruling clarifies the continuing obligations of tenants in common and reinforces the long-standing principles of Florida property law. If you are facing a dispute over jointly owned property after divorce, speaking with a Miami real estate litigation attorney can help you understand your rights and avoid costly missteps as your case develops.
Facts and Procedural History
Allegedly, the plaintiff and defendant purchased a residence during their marriage, taking title subject to a mortgage. Following the dissolution of their marriage, the final judgment incorporated a marital settlement agreement drafted by the parties without counsel. The agreement stated that any gains from the eventual sale of the property would be divided, with the plaintiff receiving a larger percentage. The agreement also required the plaintiff to pay the mortgage and prohibited her from asking the defendant to contribute toward it.
It is alleged that after the divorce, the plaintiff attempted to sell the property but abandoned the effort due to unfavorable market conditions, leaving the mortgage balance exceeding the home’s value. Instead, the plaintiff retained possession and rented the property to third parties at various times over many years. During that period, the plaintiff paid all expenses associated with the property, including taxes, insurance, and maintenance, while the defendant made no financial contributions and received no rental income. Continue reading ›
Fort Lauderdale Divorce Lawyer Blog

